“Listening to the Logos rather than to me, it is wise to agree that all things are in reality one thing and one thing only”
note: update pending Sept 2017 (physics page) –Heraclitus (Greek philosopher 500BC)
The Black-Hole Electron
Q. Why the emphasis on the black-hole electron?
A. I have constructed a model of a virtual universe using mathematical forms derived from my black-hole electron model that can explain observed phenomena. These forms are not part of the standard model and so are conjecture. They do however give the correct numerical results for the fundamental physical constants whose values are measured with a precision up to 12 digits, and so these results form the best verifiable tests of the validity of this theory. Note that the distance from the earth to sun is 149,600,000,000m = 12 digit precision, thus the precision of our results is equivalent to solving the distance from earth to sun and being correct to within meters.
The physical constants (h, c, G, e, me, kB ...) were derived and solved using this black-hole electron geometry, physics itself has yet no theory which can do this as Prof's John D. Barrow and John K. Webb note in their article "Inconstant Constants" in Scientific American Volume 292 Number 6 (June 2005) which I reproduce here as this is a crucial point as to why physics denotes these as fundamental constants and thus the importance of the derivations obtained via this model:
"Some things never change. Physicists call them the constants of nature. Such quantities as the velocity of light c, Newton's constant of gravitation G, and the mass of the electron me are assumed to be the same all places and times in the universe. The form of the scaffolding around which the theories of physics are erected, and they define the fabric of the universe. Physics has progressed by making ever more accurate measurements of their values.
And yet, remarkably, no one has successfully predicted or explained any of the constants. Physicists have no idea why they take the special numerical values that they do. In SI units, c is 299,792,458; G is 6.673 x 1011; and me is 9.10938188 x 10-31; numbers that follow no discernible pattern. The only thread running through the values is that if many of them were even slightly different, complex atomic structures such as living beings would not be possible. The desire to explain the constants has been one of the driving forces behind efforts to develop a complete unified description of nature, or "theory of everything". Physicists have hoped that such a theory would show that each of the constants of nature could only have one logical value. It would reveal an underlying order to the seeming arbitrariness of nature.
Q. Could other geometries also give the correct solutions for the fundamental constants.
A. I use these geometries to solve the constants in terms of (c, R, mu0 and alpha) ... although I did not do an exhaustive study, these were the only geometries I found which could do this.
Q. Why the black-hole
A. I have conjectured that a micro Planck size black hole is equivalent to a hard disk sector, a means of carrying data, the data being the particle itself. It is the black hole which gives the electron a posistion relative to other particles (other particle black holes).
Q. Does physics support a black hole electron
A. In physics, there is a speculative notion that if there were a black hole with the same mass, charge and angular momentum as an electron, it would share some of the properties of the electron. The electron (and all truly 'fundamental' particles) are considered to be true mathematical points in the sense that they have no classical spatial extent (they have no physical measurable size). Physics then argues that the electron cannot be a black-hole, however the black-hole electron presented in this model is not the pure black-hole of physics but a black-hole to which information (and thus particle wavelength etc) has been added. The electron point-state is equivalent to the mathematical point and the wave-state to the electromagnetic information.